On 2/9/20 9:55 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sun, Feb 09, 2020 at 09:15:46PM +0100, Toon Moene wrote:
On 2/6/20 9:01 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
PR analyzer/93405 reports an ICE when attempting to use -fanalyzer on
certain gfortran code. The second patch in this kit fixes that, but
in the meantime I need somewhere to put regression tests for -fanalyzer
with gfortran.
This patch adds a gfortran.dg/analyzer subdirectory with an analyzer.exp,
setting DEFAULT_FFLAGS on the tests run within it.
I have seen no objections against this proposal, so please go ahead.
Perhaps, there are no objections because the people who contribute
patches and provide reviews for gfortran have twindled to 1 or 2 people
with sporadic available time. Did you actually review the proposed
changes?
You are right. I did test the fix for PR93405, and thought this update
was included in that test, but it was not - my fault.
I will be more careful in the future about what I test, and show the
results (otherwise, why test ...).
Suggestion withdrawn.
--
Toon Moene - e-mail: t...@moene.org - phone: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
At home: http://moene.org/~toon/; weather: http://moene.org/~hirlam/
Progress of GNU Fortran: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortran#news
