I'm tired of seeing
cp/parser.c:15923:55: warning: misspelled term 'decl' in format; use
'declaration' instead [-Wformat-diag]
cp/parser.c:15925:57: warning: misspelled term 'decl' in format; use
'declaration' instead [-Wformat-diag]
every time I compile cp/parser.c, which happens...a lot. I'd like my
compilation to be free of warnings, otherwise I'm going to miss some
important ones.
"decl-specifiers" is a C++ grammar term; it is not actual code, so
should not be wrapped with %< %>. I hope we can accept it as an exception
in check_tokens.
It was surrounded by %< %> in cp_parser_decl_specifier_seq, so fix that.
In passing, fix a misspelling in missspellings.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?
In fact, I think I'd like to backport to 11 too, so that eventually
even my system compiler stops warning about this.
PR c++/103758
gcc/c-family/ChangeLog:
* c-format.c (check_tokens): Accept "decl-specifier*".
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* parser.c (cp_parser_decl_specifier_seq): Replace %<decl-specifier%>
with %qD.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-condition.C: Adjust dg-error.
---
gcc/c-family/c-format.c | 10 +++++++++-
gcc/cp/parser.c | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-condition.C | 2 +-
3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/c-family/c-format.c b/gcc/c-family/c-format.c
index 617fb5ea626..e1b1d6ba31e 100644
--- a/gcc/c-family/c-format.c
+++ b/gcc/c-family/c-format.c
@@ -3194,7 +3194,7 @@ check_tokens (const token_t *tokens, unsigned ntoks,
wlen, format_chars);
else
{
- /* Diagnose some common missspellings. */
+ /* Diagnose some common misspellings. */
for (unsigned i = 0; i != sizeof badwords / sizeof *badwords; ++i)
{
unsigned badwlen = strspn (badwords[i].name, " -");
@@ -3215,6 +3215,14 @@ check_tokens (const token_t *tokens, unsigned ntoks,
plural = "s";
}
+ /* As an exception, don't warn about "decl-specifier*" since
+ it's a C++ grammar production. */
+ {
+ const size_t l = strlen ("decl-specifier");
+ if (!strncmp (format_chars, "decl-specifier", l))
+ return format_chars + l - 1;
+ }
+
format_warning_substr (format_string_loc, format_string_cst,
fmtchrpos, fmtchrpos + badwords[i].len,
opt,
diff --git a/gcc/cp/parser.c b/gcc/cp/parser.c
index 44eed7ea638..3b33ae0cc21 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/parser.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/parser.c
@@ -15820,7 +15820,7 @@ cp_parser_decl_specifier_seq (cp_parser* parser,
if (found_decl_spec
&& (flags & CP_PARSER_FLAGS_ONLY_TYPE_OR_CONSTEXPR)
&& token->keyword != RID_CONSTEXPR)
- error ("%<decl-specifier%> invalid in condition");
+ error ("%qD invalid in condition", ridpointers[token->keyword]);
if (found_decl_spec
&& (flags & CP_PARSER_FLAGS_ONLY_MUTABLE_OR_CONSTEXPR)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-condition.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-condition.C
index 733d494c4d7..e81acba68ae 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-condition.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-condition.C
@@ -5,5 +5,5 @@ constexpr int something() { return 3; }
int main() {
if (constexpr long v = something()) {}
- if (static long v = something()) { } // { dg-error "'decl-specifier'
invalid" }
+ if (static long v = something()) { } // { dg-error "'static' invalid" }
}
base-commit: d7ca2a79b82c6500ead6ab983d14c609e2124eee
--
2.33.1
