On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 10:28 PM Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches
<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Per our discussion on: 
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-March/592002.html
>
> I come up with the following patch to:
>
> 1. Update the documentation for TARGET_ZERO_CALL_USED_REGS hook;
> 2. Add an assertion in function.cc to make sure the actually zeroed_regs is a 
> subset of all call used regs;
>    (The reason I didn’t add a new parameter to TARGET_ZERO_CALL_USED_REGS is, 
> I think adding the
>     assertion in the common place function.cc is simpler to be implemented).
> 3. This new assertion identified a bug in i386 implementation. Fix this bug 
> in i386.
>
> This patch is bootstrapped on both x86 and aarch64, no regression.
>
> Okay for commit?
>
> thanks.
>
> Qing
>
> ===================================
> From 2e5bc1b25a707c6a17afbf03da2a8bec5b03454d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Qing Zhao <qing.z...@oracle.com>
> Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2022 20:49:56 +0000
> Subject: [PATCH] Add an assertion: the zeroed_hardregs set is a subset of all
>  call used regs.
>
> We should make sure that the hard register set that is actually cleared by
> the target hook zero_call_used_regs should be a subset of all call used
> registers.
>
> At the same time, update documentation for the target hook
> TARGET_ZERO_CALL_USED_REGS.
>
> This new assertion identified a bug in the i386 implemenation, which
> incorrectly set the zeroed_hardregs for stack registers. Fixed this bug
> in i386 implementation.
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> 2022-03-21  Qing Zhao  <qing.z...@oracle.com>
>
>         * config/i386/i386.cc (zero_all_st_registers): Return the value of
>         num_of_st.
>         (ix86_zero_call_used_regs): Update zeroed_hardregs set according to
>         the return value of zero_all_st_registers.
>         * doc/tm.texi: Update the documentation of TARGET_ZERO_CALL_USED_REGS.
>         * function.cc (gen_call_used_regs_seq): Add an assertion.
>         * target.def: Update the documentation of TARGET_ZERO_CALL_USED_REGS.

OK for the i386 part.

Thanks,
Uros.

> ---
>  gcc/config/i386/i386.cc | 27 ++++++++++++++++++---------
>  gcc/doc/tm.texi         |  7 +++++++
>  gcc/function.cc         | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
>  gcc/target.def          |  7 +++++++
>  4 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc b/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc
> index 5a561966eb44..d84047a4bc1b 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc
> +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc
> @@ -3753,16 +3753,17 @@ zero_all_vector_registers (HARD_REG_SET 
> need_zeroed_hardregs)
>     needs to be cleared, the whole stack should be cleared.  However,
>     x87 stack registers that hold the return value should be excluded.
>     x87 returns in the top (two for complex values) register, so
> -   num_of_st should be 7/6 when x87 returns, otherwise it will be 8.  */
> +   num_of_st should be 7/6 when x87 returns, otherwise it will be 8.
> +   return the value of num_of_st.  */
>
>
> -static bool
> +static int
>  zero_all_st_registers (HARD_REG_SET need_zeroed_hardregs)
>  {
>
>    /* If the FPU is disabled, no need to zero all st registers.  */
>    if (! (TARGET_80387 || TARGET_FLOAT_RETURNS_IN_80387))
> -    return false;
> +    return 0;
>
>    unsigned int num_of_st = 0;
>    for (unsigned int regno = 0; regno < FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER; regno++)
> @@ -3774,7 +3775,7 @@ zero_all_st_registers (HARD_REG_SET 
> need_zeroed_hardregs)
>        }
>
>    if (num_of_st == 0)
> -    return false;
> +    return 0;
>
>    bool return_with_x87 = false;
>    return_with_x87 = (crtl->return_rtx
> @@ -3802,7 +3803,7 @@ zero_all_st_registers (HARD_REG_SET 
> need_zeroed_hardregs)
>        insn = emit_insn (gen_rtx_SET (st_reg, st_reg));
>        add_reg_note (insn, REG_DEAD, st_reg);
>      }
> -  return true;
> +  return num_of_st;
>  }
>
>
> @@ -3851,7 +3852,7 @@ ix86_zero_call_used_regs (HARD_REG_SET 
> need_zeroed_hardregs)
>  {
>    HARD_REG_SET zeroed_hardregs;
>    bool all_sse_zeroed = false;
> -  bool all_st_zeroed = false;
> +  int all_st_zeroed_num = 0;
>    bool all_mm_zeroed = false;
>
>    CLEAR_HARD_REG_SET (zeroed_hardregs);
> @@ -3881,9 +3882,17 @@ ix86_zero_call_used_regs (HARD_REG_SET 
> need_zeroed_hardregs)
>    if (!exit_with_mmx_mode)
>      /* x87 exit mode, we should zero all st registers together.  */
>      {
> -      all_st_zeroed = zero_all_st_registers (need_zeroed_hardregs);
> -      if (all_st_zeroed)
> -       SET_HARD_REG_BIT (zeroed_hardregs, FIRST_STACK_REG);
> +      all_st_zeroed_num = zero_all_st_registers (need_zeroed_hardregs);
> +
> +      if (all_st_zeroed_num > 0)
> +       for (unsigned int regno = FIRST_STACK_REG; regno <= LAST_STACK_REG; 
> regno++)
> +         /* x87 stack registers that hold the return value should be 
> excluded.
> +            x87 returns in the top (two for complex values) register.  */
> +         if (all_st_zeroed_num == 8
> +             || !((all_st_zeroed_num >= 6 && regno == REGNO 
> (crtl->return_rtx))
> +                  || (all_st_zeroed_num == 6
> +                      && (regno == (REGNO (crtl->return_rtx) + 1)))))
> +           SET_HARD_REG_BIT (zeroed_hardregs, regno);
>      }
>    else
>      /* MMX exit mode, check whether we can zero all mm registers.  */
> diff --git a/gcc/doc/tm.texi b/gcc/doc/tm.texi
> index 2f92d37da8c0..c5006afc00d2 100644
> --- a/gcc/doc/tm.texi
> +++ b/gcc/doc/tm.texi
> @@ -12330,6 +12330,13 @@ This target hook emits instructions to zero the 
> subset of @var{selected_regs}
>  that could conceivably contain values that are useful to an attacker.
>  Return the set of registers that were actually cleared.
>
> +For most targets, the returned set of registers is a subset of
> +@var{selected_regs}, however, for some of the targets (for example MIPS),
> +clearing some registers that are in the @var{selected_regs} requires
> +clearing other call used registers that are not in the @var{selected_regs},
> +under such situation, the returned set of registers must be a subset of all
> +call used registers.
> +
>  The default implementation uses normal move instructions to zero
>  all the registers in @var{selected_regs}.  Define this hook if the
>  target has more efficient ways of zeroing certain registers,
> diff --git a/gcc/function.cc b/gcc/function.cc
> index d5ed51a6a663..ad0096a43eff 100644
> --- a/gcc/function.cc
> +++ b/gcc/function.cc
> @@ -5892,7 +5892,9 @@ gen_call_used_regs_seq (rtx_insn *ret, unsigned int 
> zero_regs_type)
>    df_simulate_one_insn_backwards (bb, ret, live_out);
>
>    HARD_REG_SET selected_hardregs;
> +  HARD_REG_SET all_call_used_regs;
>    CLEAR_HARD_REG_SET (selected_hardregs);
> +  CLEAR_HARD_REG_SET (all_call_used_regs);
>    for (unsigned int regno = 0; regno < FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER; regno++)
>      {
>        if (!crtl->abi->clobbers_full_reg_p (regno))
> @@ -5901,6 +5903,13 @@ gen_call_used_regs_seq (rtx_insn *ret, unsigned int 
> zero_regs_type)
>         continue;
>        if (REGNO_REG_SET_P (live_out, regno))
>         continue;
> +#ifdef LEAF_REG_REMAP
> +      if (crtl->uses_only_leaf_regs && LEAF_REG_REMAP (regno) < 0)
> +       continue;
> +#endif
> +      /* This is a call used register that is dead at return.  */
> +      SET_HARD_REG_BIT (all_call_used_regs, regno);
> +
>        if (only_gpr
>           && !TEST_HARD_REG_BIT (reg_class_contents[GENERAL_REGS], regno))
>         continue;
> @@ -5908,10 +5917,6 @@ gen_call_used_regs_seq (rtx_insn *ret, unsigned int 
> zero_regs_type)
>         continue;
>        if (only_arg && !FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P (regno))
>         continue;
> -#ifdef LEAF_REG_REMAP
> -      if (crtl->uses_only_leaf_regs && LEAF_REG_REMAP (regno) < 0)
> -       continue;
> -#endif
>
>        /* Now this is a register that we might want to zero.  */
>        SET_HARD_REG_BIT (selected_hardregs, regno);
> @@ -5925,6 +5930,15 @@ gen_call_used_regs_seq (rtx_insn *ret, unsigned int 
> zero_regs_type)
>    HARD_REG_SET zeroed_hardregs;
>    start_sequence ();
>    zeroed_hardregs = targetm.calls.zero_call_used_regs (selected_hardregs);
> +
> +  /* For most targets, the returned set of registers is a subset of
> +     selected_hardregs, however, for some of the targets (for example MIPS),
> +     clearing some registers that are in selected_hardregs requires clearing
> +     other call used registers that are not in the selected_hardregs, under
> +     such situation, the returned set of registers must be a subset of
> +     all call used registers.  */
> +  gcc_assert (hard_reg_set_subset_p (zeroed_hardregs, all_call_used_regs));
> +
>    rtx_insn *seq = get_insns ();
>    end_sequence ();
>    if (seq)
> diff --git a/gcc/target.def b/gcc/target.def
> index 72c2e1ef756c..d85adf36a391 100644
> --- a/gcc/target.def
> +++ b/gcc/target.def
> @@ -5122,6 +5122,13 @@ DEFHOOK
>  that could conceivably contain values that are useful to an attacker.\n\
>  Return the set of registers that were actually cleared.\n\
>  \n\
> +For most targets, the returned set of registers is a subset of\n\
> +@var{selected_regs}, however, for some of the targets (for example MIPS),\n\
> +clearing some registers that are in the @var{selected_regs} requires\n\
> +clearing other call used registers that are not in the 
> @var{selected_regs},\n\
> +under such situation, the returned set of registers must be a subset of 
> all\n\
> +call used registers.\n\
> +\n\
>  The default implementation uses normal move instructions to zero\n\
>  all the registers in @var{selected_regs}.  Define this hook if the\n\
>  target has more efficient ways of zeroing certain registers,\n\
> --
> 2.27.0
>

Reply via email to