Given that 12 has been branched off, is it OK now to commit this patch? On 22-04-14 16:09:35, Piotr Kubaj wrote: > On 22-04-14 09:05:17, FX wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > can you check the following patch? > > > > Why restrict it to powerpc-freebsd only, and not all freebsd? Do they > > differ? > amd64 and i386 on all systems use a different setting and are not affected. > For FreeBSD-supported architectures that are not amd64, i386 or powerpc*, > there are also armv6, armv7, aarch64, riscv64 and riscv64sf. > > However, GCC is currently not ported to riscv64 and riscv64sf (but it's > likely affected as well). > aarch64 is confirmed to be affected (so armv6 and armv7 are probably also > affected), but I don't have any way to test whether it works on aarch64 that > way. > > So currently limiting to powerpc*, but it will probably be extended to armv*, > aarch64 and riscv64* in the future. > > > Otherwise it looks ok to me, but probably should be tested on a glibc > > non-x86 target. > > > > In any case, this will be for the new branch, when stage 1 reopens. > > > > FX > > --
--
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
