On Thu, 15 Dec 2022 16:46:50 +0000
Julian Brown <jul...@codesourcery.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 15 Dec 2022 14:54:58 +0000
> Julian Brown <jul...@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 7 Dec 2022 17:31:20 +0100
> > Tobias Burnus <tob...@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> >   
> > > Hi Julian,
> > > 
> > > I think this patch is OK; however, at least for gimplify.cc Jakub
> > > needs to have a second look.    
> > 
> > Thanks for the review!  Here's a new version that hopefully
> > addresses your comments.  (The gimplify bits change a bit more in
> > this version!)  
> 
> FYI, this is the current dependency list for this patch:
> 
> (1) "OpenMP/OpenACC: Reindent TO/FROM/_CACHE_ stanza in
> {c_}finish_omp_clause"
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/603791.html
> Approved.
> 
> (2) "OpenMP/OpenACC: Rework clause expansion and nested struct
> handling"
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/603792.html
> Approved, but waiting for *this* patch to avoid regressing Fortran
> pointer-mapping behaviour, and which Tobias noticed an issue with
> prior to committing, addressed by (4).
> 
> (3) "OpenMP/OpenACC: Refine condition for when map clause expansion
> happens"
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-November/607543.html
> Not reviewed (partly OpenACC).
> 
> (4) "OpenMP: implicitly map base pointer for array-section pointer
> components"
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-December/608318.html
> Not reviewed.
> 
> The following patches also depend on this one and the above:
> 
> (5) "OpenMP: lvalue parsing for map clauses (C++)"
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-November/605367.html
> Mostly approved.
> 
> (6) "OpenMP: C++ "declare mapper" support"
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-November/607544.html
> Revised version unreviewed.
> 
> ...and the to-be-revised "lvalue parsing for C", and C/Fortran
> "declare mapper" patches.

Followup:

https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-December/609031.html


Reply via email to