On 2 November 2023 11:25:47 CET, Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com> wrote: >On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 10:23, Andreas Schwab wrote: >> >> On Nov 02 2023, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> >> > Git tags are cheap, but I can imagine a concern about hundreds of new >> > tags "littering" the output of 'git tag -l'. I don't _think_ you can >> > put tags under an alternative ref that isn't fetched by default (as we >> > do with refs/users and refs/vendor). I think tags have to go under >> > refs/tags. But grep -v could be used to filter out snapshot tags >> > easily. >> >> There is no inherent limitation on publishing tags outside of refs/tags, >> to make them invisible by git tag. There are already existing examples >> of tags residing under various refs/users and refs/vendors namespaces. > > >Ah, good to know, thanks. > >So then there's no reason that snapshots would have to clutter up the >list of default tags for anybody who isn't interested in them. >
Thanks Andreas. Exactly. So, just to emphasise the obvious: Let's please use refs/snapshot ?
