On 22/11/2023 15:21, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> Use non-capturing parentheses for the subexpressions used with 
> `scan-assembler-times', to avoid a quirk with double-counting.
> 
>       gcc/testsuite/
>       * gcc.target/aarch64/ccmp_1.c: Use non-capturing parentheses 
>       with `scan-assembler-times'.

OK

R.

> ---
> Hi,
> 
>  Here's another one.  I realised my original regexp used to grep the tree 
> for `scan-assembler-times' with subexpressions was too strict and with an 
> updated pattern I found this second test case that does regress once the 
> `scan-assembler-times' double-counting quirk has been fixed.
> 
>  As with the ARM change we don't need capturing parentheses here, usually 
> used for back references, so let's just avoid the double-counting quirk 
> altogether and make our matching here work whether the quirk has been 
> fixed or not.
> 
>  Verified for the `aarch64-linux-gnu' target with the quirk fix submitted 
> as <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-November/637254.html> 
> and the aarch64.exp subset of the C language test suite.  OK to apply?
> 
>   Maciej
> ---
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/ccmp_1.c |    4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> gcc-aarch64-test-ccmp_1-non-capturing.diff
> Index: gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/ccmp_1.c
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc.orig/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/ccmp_1.c
> +++ gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/ccmp_1.c
> @@ -86,8 +86,8 @@ f13 (int a, int b)
>  /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "cmp\t(.)+35" } } */
>  
>  /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\tcmp\tw\[0-9\]+, 0" 4 } } */
> -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "fcmpe\t(.)+0\\.0" 2 } } */
> -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "fcmp\t(.)+0\\.0" 2 } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "fcmpe\t(?:.)+0\\.0" 1 } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "fcmp\t(?:.)+0\\.0" 1 } } */
>  
>  /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "adds\t" } } */
>  /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\tccmp\t" 11 } } */

Reply via email to