On 02/02/24 12:14 +0000, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
This should fix the problem that libstdc++exp.a doesn't actually contain
the symbols from libstdc++fs.a, despite me claiming it did.
This increases the size of libstdc++exp.a considerably, because now it
really does contain what I intended it to contain. We might be able to
avoid that increased on-disk footprint by replacing the installed
version of libstdc++fs.a with a linker script that does
INPUT(-lstdc++exp.a) but for now duplicating things seems OK. Vendors
Oops, that should be INPUT(-lstdc++exp) obviously, without the .a
extension.
can replace libstdc++fs.a with a linker script if they want to.
