Hi Jerry,

I think there is the risk of buffer overrun in the following places:

+             char message[IOMSG_LEN];
+ child_iomsg_len = string_len_trim (IOMSG_LEN, child_iomsg) + 1;
              free_line (dtp);
              snprintf (message, child_iomsg_len, child_iomsg);
              generate_error (&dtp->common, dtp->u.p.child_saved_iostat,

plus several more. Wouldn't it be better to increase the size of message by one?

Thanks,
Harald


On 3/5/24 04:15, Jerry D wrote:
On 3/1/24 11:24 AM, rep.dot....@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jerry and Steve,

On 29 February 2024 19:28:19 CET, Jerry D <jvdelis...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2/29/24 10:13 AM, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 09:36:43AM -0800, Jerry D wrote:
On 2/29/24 1:47 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:

And, just for my own education, the length limitation of iomsg to 255
chars is not backed by the standard AFAICS, right? It's just our
STRERR_MAXSZ?

Yes, its what we have had for a long lone time. Once you throw an error things get very processor dependent. I found MSGLEN set to 100 and IOMSG_len
to 256. Nothing magic about it.


There is no restriction on the length for the iomsg-variable
that receives the generated error message.  In fact, if the
iomsg-variable has a deferred-length type parameter, then
(re)-allocation to the exact length is expected.

    F2023

    12.11.6 IOMSG= specifier

    If an error, end-of-file, or end-of-record condition occurs during
    execution of an input/output statement, iomsg-variable is assigned
    an explanatory message, as if by intrinsic assignment. If no such
    condition occurs, the definition status and value of iomsg-variable
    are unchanged.
   character(len=23) emsg
read(fd,*,iomsg=emsg)

Here, the generated iomsg is either truncated to a length of 23
or padded with blanks to a length of 23.

character(len=:), allocatable :: emsg
read(fd,*,iomsg=emsg)

Here, emsg should have the length of whatever error message was
generated.
   HTH


Well, currently, if someone uses a larger string than 256 we are going to chop it off.

Do we want to process this differently now?

Yes. There is some odd hunk about discrepancy of passed len and actual len afterwards in 22-007-r1, IIRC. Didn't look closely though.

--- snip ---

Attached is the revised patch using the already available string_len_trim function.

This hunk is only executed if a user has not passed an iostat or iomsg variable in the parent I/O statement and an error is triggered which terminates execution of the program. In this case, the iomsg string is provided in the usual error message in a "processor defined" way.

(F2023):

12.6.4.8.3 Executing defined input/output data transfers
---
11 If the iostat argument of the defined input/output procedure has a nonzero value when that procedure returns, and the processor therefore terminates execution of the program as described in 12.11, the processor shall make the value of the iomsg argument available in a processor-dependent manner.
---

OK for trunk?

Regards,

Jerry




Reply via email to