Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?

-- >8 --
Patrick noticed that my r14-9339-gdc6c3bfb59baab patch is wrong;
we're dealing with a noexcept-spec there, not a noexcept-expr, so
setting cp_noexcept_operand et al is incorrect.  Back to the drawing
board then.

To fix noexcept84.C, we should probably avoid doing push_to_top_level
in certain cases.  Patrick suggested checking:

  const bool push_to_top = current_function_decl != fn;

which works, but I'm not sure I follow the logic there.  I also came
up with

  const bool push_to_top = !decl_function_context (fn);

which also works.  But ultimately I went with !DECL_TEMPLATE_INSTANTIATED;
if DECL_TEMPLATE_INSTANTIATED is set, we've already pushed to top level
if it was necessary in instantiate_body.

This also fixes c++/114349, introduced by r14-9339.

        PR c++/114349

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

        * pt.cc (maybe_instantiate_noexcept): Don't push_to_top_level if
        fn has already been instantiated.  Don't save/restore
        cp_unevaluated_operand, c_inhibit_evaluation_warnings, and
        cp_noexcept_operand around the tsubst_expr call.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        * g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept85.C: New test.
        * g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept86.C: New test.
---
 gcc/cp/pt.cc                            | 17 ++++++-------
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept85.C | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept86.C | 25 +++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept85.C
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept86.C

diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.cc b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
index 8cf0d5b7a8d..b7ebd93ac7d 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/pt.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
@@ -26855,7 +26855,12 @@ maybe_instantiate_noexcept (tree fn, tsubst_flags_t 
complain)
        }
       else if (push_tinst_level (fn))
        {
-         push_to_top_level ();
+         /* If we've already instantiated FN, there's no need to push to
+            top level (as instantiate_body already pushed to top level if
+            needed).  */
+         const bool push_to_top = !DECL_TEMPLATE_INSTANTIATED (fn);
+         if (push_to_top)
+           push_to_top_level ();
          push_access_scope (fn);
          push_deferring_access_checks (dk_no_deferred);
          input_location = DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (fn);
@@ -26878,17 +26883,10 @@ maybe_instantiate_noexcept (tree fn, tsubst_flags_t 
complain)
          if (orig_fn)
            ++processing_template_decl;
 
-         ++cp_unevaluated_operand;
-         ++c_inhibit_evaluation_warnings;
-         ++cp_noexcept_operand;
          /* Do deferred instantiation of the noexcept-specifier.  */
          noex = tsubst_expr (DEFERRED_NOEXCEPT_PATTERN (noex),
                              DEFERRED_NOEXCEPT_ARGS (noex),
                              tf_warning_or_error, fn);
-         --cp_unevaluated_operand;
-         --c_inhibit_evaluation_warnings;
-         --cp_noexcept_operand;
-
          /* Build up the noexcept-specification.  */
          spec = build_noexcept_spec (noex, tf_warning_or_error);
 
@@ -26898,7 +26896,8 @@ maybe_instantiate_noexcept (tree fn, tsubst_flags_t 
complain)
          pop_deferring_access_checks ();
          pop_access_scope (fn);
          pop_tinst_level ();
-         pop_from_top_level ();
+         if (push_to_top)
+           pop_from_top_level ();
        }
       else
        spec = noexcept_false_spec;
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept85.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept85.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..b415bb46bc9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept85.C
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+// PR c++/114349
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+using A = struct {};
+template <template <typename> class, typename, typename>
+using B = A;
+template <typename T>
+using C = typename T::D;
+struct E {
+  using D = B<C, int, A>;
+};
+template <class> constexpr bool foo (A) { return false; }
+template <class T> struct F {
+  using G = T;
+  using H = E;
+  F(const F &);
+  void operator=(F) noexcept(foo <G> (H::D{}));
+};
+template <typename, typename, typename>
+using I = F<int>;
+template <typename K, typename V, typename H = K>
+using J = I<K, V, H>;
+struct K {
+  typedef J<long, char> L;
+  L k;
+  K();
+};
+struct M {
+  bool bar () const;
+  K::L m;
+};
+K n;
+bool M::bar () const { n.k = m; return true; }
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept86.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept86.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..2d040c090f5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept86.C
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+// PR c++/114349
+// { dg-do compile { target c++14 } }
+
+struct B
+{
+  int i;
+};
+
+template <bool BA>
+void
+goo ()
+{
+  constexpr bool is_yes = BA;
+  struct C
+  {
+    static auto g(B b) noexcept(is_yes) { }
+  };
+  C::g({});
+}
+
+void
+x ()
+{
+  goo<false>();
+}

base-commit: 48d49200510198cafcab55601cd8e5f8eb541f01
-- 
2.44.0

Reply via email to