On Thu, 4 Apr 2024, David Malcolm wrote: > Signed-off-by: David Malcolm <dmalc...@redhat.com> > --- > htdocs/gcc-14/changes.html | 23 ++++++++++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/htdocs/gcc-14/changes.html b/htdocs/gcc-14/changes.html > index 5cc729c5..397458d5 100644 > --- a/htdocs/gcc-14/changes.html > +++ b/htdocs/gcc-14/changes.html > @@ -149,26 +149,33 @@ a work-in-progress.</p> > to enable additional hardening. > </li> > <li> > - New option <code>-fhardened</code>, an umbrella option that enables a set > - of hardening flags. The options it enables can be displayed using the > + New option > + <a > href="https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Instrumentation-Options.html#index-fhardened";><code>-fhardened</code></a>,
Shouldn't those URLs better point to a specific version, lest they might break with any newer release? The question is "a bit" rhetorical, since there appears to be nothing at onlinedocs/gcc-14.0.0/ (and "nearby numbers"). Still, maybe there ought to be a copy of onlinedocs/gcc/ that is frozen at time of release. brgds, H-P
