Thanks Vineet! > The dynamic icounts looks sane (vs. Apr 10 snapshot) except for a > regression in x264 which is likely independent of the chaos going on. > > Apr 10 | Apr 23 | > 109f1b28fc94 | 6f0a646dd2fc | > ----------------+-----------------+-------- > 276,584,692,883 | 277,816,987,018 | -0.45% > 913,452,236,000 | 927,291,935,180 | -1.52% > 903,916,092,805 | 915,364,006,176 | -1.27%
x264 uses widening arithmetic so it could be the reverts. Can you compare the hot functions (e.g. x264_pixel_sad_16x16) if anything stands out surrounding the vwadd.wv for example? Regards Robin
