> Just one question about the include/std/limits changes below. > > It seems that __glibcxx_signed_b isn't strictly necessary as it > doesn't use the B argument, so is it just there for consistency?
Yup.
> Just one question about the include/std/limits changes below. > > It seems that __glibcxx_signed_b isn't strictly necessary as it > doesn't use the B argument, so is it just there for consistency?
Yup.