Hi Jonathan, On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 01:32:11PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely via Gdb wrote: > On Thu, 4 Apr 2024, 22:36 Mark Wielaard, <m...@klomp.org> wrote: > > wrt to the mailinglists maybe getting larger patches, I think most > > will still be under 400K and I wouldn't raise the limit (because most > > such larger emails are really just spam). But we might want to get > > more mailinglist moderators. > > > > gcc-patches, binutils and gdb-patches all have only one moderator > > (Jeff, Ian and Thiago). It would probably be good if there were > > more. > > > > Any volunteers? It shouldn't be more than 1 to 3 emails a week > > (sadly most of them spam). > > I'm happy to help moderating/spambusting for the GCC lists.
I see you are already doing that for the libstdc++ mailinglist, but you are the only moderator. Maybe you want someone as backup there? The jit mailinglist is the same. It only has one moderator (David). Having a second/backup one would probably be nice. Are you ok to be added there? (I see that both the libstdc++ and jit mailinglist just allow up to 5MB patches, which probably means they don't block any legitimate ones, but might get a bit more spam than necessary). It isn't a patches mailinglist, so slightly less urgent, but the gcc-help mailinglist doesn't have any moderators. Would you be willing to help out with that one? Thanks, Mark
