On 08.05.24 11:50, Richard Biener wrote:
"With the |-fpermissive| option, programs can use C99 inlining semantics
and features that were removed from C99"

Umm, what? this sentence doesn't make sense.
In the context of mentioning the -std=gnu89/-std=c89 workarounds

I thought as much, but shouldn't it then say "programs can use *C89* inlining semantics that were removed from C99"?

If something has been removed from C99, then by definition it is not part of C99's semantics.

--
-- mit freundlichen Grüßen
--
-- Matthias Urlichs

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to