On Saturday 05 November 2022 02:26:52 Pali Rohár wrote: > On Saturday 05 November 2022 01:57:49 Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Monday 31 October 2022 10:55:59 Jan Beulich wrote: > > > On 30.10.2022 02:06, Pali Rohár via Binutils wrote: > > > > * GCC or LD (not sure who) sets memory alignment characteristics > > > > (IMAGE_SCN_ALIGN_MASK) into the sections of PE executable binary. > > > > These characteristics should be only in COFF object files, not > > > > executable binaries. Specially they should not be in NT kernel > > > > drivers. > > > > > > Like Martin pointed out in reply for another item, I'm pretty sure > > > this one was taken care of in bfd already (and iirc is in 2.39). You > > > fail to mention at all what versions of the various components you > > > use. > > > > Ou, sorry for that. I take care to write issues in all details and > > totally forgot to write such important information like tool versions. > > > > Now I retested all issues on Debian 11 which has LD 2.35.2 and GCC > > 10.2.1 and all issues are there still valid except data characteristic > > IMAGE_SCN_CNT_INITIALIZED_DATA for code sections IMAGE_SCN_CNT_CODE. > > > > I can easily retest it with LD 2.39 and GCC 10.3.0 which is in Debian > > testing. > > Retested with LD 2.39 and GCC 10.3.0 which is in Debian testing and > following problems are additionally fixed: --exclude-all-symbols, > --dynamicbase and IMAGE_SCN_ALIGN_MASK (which you mentioned above). All > other still reminds. > > Do you need some other information?
Hello! I would like to ask if you need some other details or something else for these issues. > > > I guess before reporting such a long list of issue you would > > > have wanted to test at least with the most recent releases of each > > > of the involved components. I wouldn't exclude some further items > > > could then be scratched off your list. > > > > > > Jan
