On Nov 8, 2022, Alan Modra via Gdb-patches <gdb-patc...@sourceware.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 06:23:45PM +0000, Joseph Myers wrote: >> On Mon, 7 Nov 2022, Alan Modra via Binutils wrote: >> >> > a) that top-level binutils/gdb patches don't get applied to the gcc >> > git repository in a timely manner, or >> >> If a toplevel patch is approved for either repository, I think you should >> treat it as approved for the other one without needing separate review. > Thanks Joseph, that's how I see it too. Of course with the > understanding that binutils-gdb can't be used as a back door way of > sneaking in a gcc-specific change. > Can I get agreement among the gcc build maintainers that such a > policy is acceptable? FTR, II've long assumed that this cooperation in maintaining the top-level build machinery worked both ways already. Reducing divergence is a plus IMHO. -- Alexandre Oliva, happy hacker https://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo/ Free Software Activist GNU Toolchain Engineer Disinformation flourishes because many people care deeply about injustice but very few check the facts. Ask me about <https://stallmansupport.org>
