Perhaps the conversation should be more about equal representation of gender in articles like this...
Just a thought :) Sarah Sent via iPhone - I apologize in advance for my shortness or errors! :) On Apr 27, 2012, at 3:33 PM, Emily Monroe <emilymonro...@gmail.com> wrote: > While the picture could be described as somewhat pornographic, I'll > have to agree with previous participants in this email conversation. This > article IS porn-related, so a pornographic cartoon can be used to illustrate > it, per WP:NOTCENSORED. > > From, > Emily > > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Carol Moore DC <carolmoor...@verizon.net> > wrote: > NO need to censor it. Just do a second one with bushier eyebrows and a goatee > and put that up instead :-) > > > On 4/27/2012 1:50 PM, Béria Lima wrote: >> >> Katrin, I hate to be captain obvious here, but: Do you know that "cun shot" >> is a porn related term right? Only used in Porn related articles (see >> related articles)? And that what is in the article isn't a picture, but a >> illustration? >> >> I do agreed when people complained about the naked gardening article and >> pic, because isn't a sex related article. But this IS a sex related article, >> not only, this one is a PORN related article. Is not like someone will fall >> there accidentally by looking for Jesus or Santa. Therefore, I don't see the >> reason to censor the article. >> ____ >> Béria Lima >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Gendergap mailing list > Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap > > > _______________________________________________ > Gendergap mailing list > Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
_______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
