On 3/24/13 6:32 AM, Shlomi Fish wrote:
And all that while not depriving themselves of sexuality and sexiness among
members of the appropriate sexes (MOTAS), in part because being sexually
attractive (and naturally - not only physically) is indicative of
competence and values, rather than the opposite as was sometimes implied
recently.

You had me up until this point. How is being sexually attractive indicative of competence and values? By this logic, only Miss/Mr. Universe winners should run for President.

Ryan Kaldari

_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

Reply via email to