Awesome article. Sorry to hear about your troubles with the peanut gallery.

Ryan


On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 6:45 PM, Daniel and Elizabeth Case <
danc...@frontiernet.net> wrote:

>   It’s one thing to read about the sort of harsh reactions women get
> while editing that discourages them from continuing.
>
> It’s a second thing to experience it yourself.
>
>
> Late last week I was browsing *Slate* when I read their reprint (
> http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2014/06/11/lolly_wolly_doodle_brandi_temple_s_north_carolina_children_s_clothing_startup.html)
> of this month’s *Inc.* magazine cover story, about a company called Lolly
> Wolly Doodle, a children’s clothing company started by Brandi Temple a
> woman in North Carolina with no real prior business experience, who had by
> her own admission never wanted to be anything more than a trophy wife when
> she was younger. She apparently figured out how to sell on Facebook,
> something major retailers have failed to do, and she’s now the CEO of a
> rapidly-growing company that’s gotten some serious venture-capital funding,
> doing over half of its $10 million+ annual business on FB and by their own
> lights the largest retailer on that site.
>
> I checked to see if we had an article on this company. We didn’t, so I
> started one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lolly_Wolly_Doodle, complete
> with an infobox with the company logo and a free image of one of its
> dresses I found on Flickr. I reflected as I did so that the reason that
> this company had gotten all the media coverage it had in the tech and
> business press yet remained off our radar said entirely too much about our
> gender gap ... if we had just a few more probably regular editors who also
> are avid Pinterest users, I bet, we’d have had at least a stub a long time
> ago.
>
> But, that was all water under the bridge. Or so I thought.
>
> I nominated it for DYK on Friday. Late today, I get these responses:
>
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Lolly_Wolly_Doodle&diff=613195333&oldid=612812989
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Lolly_Wolly_Doodle&diff=613195754&oldid=613195333
>
> They were enough to ruin the good mood I was in following the USA’s World
> Cup win over Ghana and our neighbor coming over to invite my wife and I to
> her daughter’s graduation party. I have real trouble believing that
> Eppstein even read it (“whole paragraphs” are sourced to the company’s own
> history on its webpage? Huh? That it’s not neutral and too promotional?
> Everything it is sourced and attributed. And that dismissive conclusion
> about “story-telling mode about the struggles of the founders to find
> their way in the world” Maybe it’s just me, but I don’t think a
> similarly-written story about a business set up by men would get this level
> of criticism.
>
> Sorry if anyone was bothered by this, but I had to vent. I will be going
> into greater detail about why this review was so off base when I request
> that someone else review it instead (something I have very rarely done with
> all the DYKs I’ve nominated).
>
> Daniel Case
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gendergap mailing list
> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>
>
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

Reply via email to