https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive853#Disruption_of_Wikiproject
There will clearly never be a consensus for any administrative action to
be taken with respect to this incident, therefore this discussion only
continues to serve as a drama-generating time vampire. Both sides of the
argument need to step back, take a deep breath, and act like rational
adults. The editors that are alleging disruption need to realize that
there is a difference between someone being uncivil/disruptive and
someone simply disagreeing with your point of view. The editors who have
been accused of disruption need to realize that while it is ok to
disagree with someone's point of view, doing it in a brusque or rude
manner will only make it less likely that the other side will actually
consider your point of view, rather than simply focus on your attitude
and ultimately end up in an entirely unproductive discussion like the
one you see below here.
In summary, no action will come of this discussion, and all of the
involved parties here need to work this out amongst themselves like
mature adults.
+++
One editor was disgusted and requested an Arbitration which looks like
it will be declined, which is preferred until we at least find out if
these guys intend to keep it up. (I know my Wikihounder of the last
year intends to and has been doing so.)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Gender_Gap_Task_Force_Issues
+++
Despite the large number of individuals disgusted with the disruption,
some Admins and Arbitrators refuse to take it seriously.
Unfortunately, the only real solution is Electing Admins and Aribtrators
against the Gender Gap.
But who needs the grief??
CM
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
