Yeah, I don't see how this is at all relevant to the gender gap. Please moderate the sender.
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 1:27 PM, George Herbert <george.herb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I was going back and forth on speaking up myself, but I concur. > > George William Herbert > Sent from my iPhone > > On Nov 18, 2014, at 1:21 PM, Nathan <nawr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello the moderators, I think the legal threats implied in this e-mail > (and the other) are sufficient to warrant moderating the sender. > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Romana Busse <romana.bu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Dear Mr. Davies >> >> From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee#Members >> I observe you are an "inactive" Member of this alleged committee. I >> hence suspect that your email is bogus. >> >> Accordingly I would appreciate receiving a signed email, or even a >> scanned signed email clearly given on behalf of the Arbitration >> Committee listing its physical address for service of legal process. >> >> I am shocked by the casual and secretive approach adopted to such >> concerns of child pornography, especially when it was previously made >> on another website http://wikipediocracy.com, naming 2 of your users >> "Sitush" and "Bishonen" using sexually colored language and referring >> to child pornography on your website. This Sitush is a serial stalker >> and harasser of female Wikipedia editors as your Arbcom knows well.. >> >> It is certainly strange that I was blocked as a sock puppet at the >> instance of these same 2 users (1 of whom is your Admin) when I >> brought that message to their attention. It seems Wikipedia actively >> discourages reporting such sexual harassment to Admins and wipes out >> all trace of it from public gaze, to the extent of terminating the >> account of the person who reported me for being an alleged >> sockpuppet.. >> >> It is even stranger that you will not disclose / specify the multiple >> accounts and IPs I am accused of using as an alleged sock puppet or >> why I am accused of being an India Against Corruption sockpuppet when >> I have never edited any page concerned with that body. It is very >> strange that Arbcom will not comply with its own policies for this. . >> >> It is clear that the Arbcom is covering up the actions of its >> anonymous users implicated in child pornography by another website. >> >> I urge you to reconsider as I firmly intend to pursue this matter and >> investigate all your own antecedents on your inactions.. >> >> On 11/19/14, Roger Davies <roger.davies.w...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > Romana Busse: >> > >> > This is to acknowledge receipt of your emails of yesterday and today. >> > >> > The Arbitration Committee is unable to assist you further in this >> > matter. Any further communications should be sent to: >> > >> > le...@wikimedia.org >> > >> > Roger Davies >> > Arbitration Committee >> > >> > >> > >> > On 18/11/2014 15:41, Romana Busse wrote: >> >> Dear Anthony (AGK) >> >> >> >> I'm very sorry to bother you, but could I have a timeline with respect >> >> to deletion, or not, of those images ? >> >> >> >> With the welfare of the children in mind, I feel that the school, the >> >> children's parents and the local child welfare committees, magistrates >> >> and police should be properly sensitized to the incidents of that >> >> day, and to ensure it cannot reoccur >> >> >> >> I'm sure the police and the Indian Govt Cyber Advisory Committee would >> >> be interested in learning from you or NYBrad the finer points of law >> >> whereby Citizendium encyclopedia decides to completely wipes out the >> >> images within 12 hours but Wikipedia has not done anything till now on >> >> identical complaint. >> >> >> >> I would also like to know by when you will publish across all >> >> Wikipedia projects the complete list of accounts and IPs I have >> >> allegedly used, and also if I am a sockpuppet of User:MehulWB as >> >> alleged or not. This is required by your same policy WP:SOCK under >> >> which was blocked. >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> >> >> On 11/18/14, Romana Busse <romana.bu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> This is about a potential threat to clearly identifiable Indian minor >> >>> school children whose images are retained on WMF servers in USA and >> >>> India despite legal notice to remove them. >> >>> Taken within their school (where their parents expected the same >> >>> degree of privacy as they enjoy at home) and uploaded without their >> >>> permission, consent or knowledge, at a location where they allegedly >> >>> viewed grossly obscene pornography accessed on a Wikimedia Foundation >> >>> service which has now been disabled on complaint by a body called >> >>> [[India Against Corruption]]. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> ArbCom-appeals-en mailing list >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BASC >> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/arbcom-appeals-en >> >> >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gendergap mailing list >> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap >> > > _______________________________________________ > Gendergap mailing list > Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap > > > _______________________________________________ > Gendergap mailing list > Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap > >
_______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
