I think one thing that could help is to reclaim the GGTF. The thing is to remain unflappable and ignore The Troll. On Jan 24, 2015 9:36 AM, "Sarah" <slimvir...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 7:26 AM, J Hayes <slowki...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> well, they did not revdel it. >> arbcom can drive the discussion off wiki, >> but cannot ban the Guardian for "bad journalism" >> certain account behaviors are being favored >> you should expect to see a lot more of those behaviors in the future >> >> this will necessitate a lot of wiki-splaining >> >> thank-you arbcom for firing up every up coming feminist editathon >> you may not care how how you are perceived, >> but the negative blowback will tarnish all of wikimedia >> >> Smallbones has suggested > <https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3AWikiProject_Countering_systemic_bias%2FGender_gap_task_force&diff=643969579&oldid=643910647> > on the GGTF talk page that a group of Wikipedians petition the Foundation > to > > "take steps to identify and remove institutionalized sexism on > Wikipedia." > > One issue that has concerned me is that editors who care about these > issues don't combine our weight. We have the GGTF, this mailing list, the > Twitter and Facebook accounts, but we don't act with one voice when it > matters. I'm not sure of the reasons for that, but I think it damages our > efforts. What can we do to start pulling together more? > > Sarah > > _______________________________________________ > Gendergap mailing list > Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org > To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please > visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap >
_______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
