yes and some time dilation and taking pictures of people with user name tags on, so outing
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Pete Forsyth <petefors...@gmail.com> wrote: > This feature article from Bloomberg BusinessWeek does, IMO, a great job of > exploring and contextualizing Wikipedia's diversity issues. The reporters > really did their homework on this one, taking the time to explore all > angles. > > There are certainly a few factual errors, the most egregious are probably > the confusing between policy and guideline on paid editing, and the > conflation of Wikipedia and WMF in a couple places. > > Thoughts? > > > Is Wikipedia Woke? > The ubiquitous reference site tries to expand its editor ranks beyond the > Comic Con set. > by Dimitra Kessenides and Max Chafkin > December 22, 2016 > > https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2016-12-22/how- > woke-is-wikipedia-s-editorial-pool > > -Pete > -- > [[User:Peteforsyth]] > > _______________________________________________ > Gendergap mailing list > Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org > To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please > visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap >
_______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
