nope - this was an incident at wikiconUSA 2015 apparently nothing done which has impacted the credibility of arbcom and susa (i was not witness, but i find the complainants credible)
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:54 PM, Pine W <wiki.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm unfamiliar with this situation, but if there's a functionary whose > off-wiki behavior calls into question of the appropriateness of his/her > continuing > to have access to PII, please do forward that information to SuSa, the > Ombudsman Committee, and/or (as applicable) the local arbitration committee > that would have the ability to investigate the situation. > > Pine > > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 8:29 PM, J Hayes <slowki...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> yes, that functionary and his behavior on meta has chilled the >> participation of some librarian editors >> they are highly skeptical of wiki harrassment efforts as long as he is in >> a position to see personal identifying information. >> they do not trust check user to be done responsibly as well >> >> this is impacting our efforts to engage a GLAM institution. >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Neotarf <neot...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Speaking of dox and in-person events, a few months ago one of the >>> WP:BADSITES known for dox had a thread about attending a WMF >>> harassment workshop. So anyone who is not comfortable with a paper >>> trail, and would prefer face-to-face conversations with allies, could >>> actually find themselves face to face with their harassers instead. >>> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Gendergap mailing list > Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org > To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please > visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap >
_______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
