Can someone look at this for me? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Women%27s_Equality_Party#Proposal_to_remove_.27nonpartisan.27_from_the_info_box
The Women's Equality Party is non-partisan. It is willing to work with ANY and ALL OTHER PARTIES. It is a key fact about them as a party. I think removing it would breach WP:INFOBOXPURPOSE "to summarize (and not supplant) key facts that appear in the article". I've also offered multiple sources to demonstrate its non-partisanship. All the comments seem to be debating whether the party IS non-partisan, if a party CAN BE non-partisan etc. and consensus building on that point. The Women's Equality Party is not affiliated to any OTHER party, a key fact which is made repeatedly clear in the article. I think it needs an administrator to make a ruling on the Wikipedia POLICY POINTS that I have made (no-one has taken me up on any of them in the discussion), rather than a consensus based on the ding-dong over the concept of non-partisanship generally. For me this is an attempt at censorship. >"We cannot suggest that WEP are a bunch of head-bangers if they are willing to >work with anyone, regardless of which side of the political divide they come >from." >"Let's take 'non-partisan' out of the infobox, it makes the party sound too >reasonable." Marie _______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
