Hi +1 binding, due to DISCLAIMER-WIP. 
Looks front page issue has been fixed.
Here is my check list,



[x] Download links are valid.

[x] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.

[x] LICENSE, NOTICE and DISCLAIMER-WIP exist. (NOTICE needs updating).

[ ] All files have license headers if necessary (Some of files have no header, 
e.g., [1][2]).



[1] apache-pegasus-2.2.0-incubating-src/rdsn/include/dsn/utility/binary_reader.h
[2] apache-pegasus-2.2.0-incubating-src/rdsn/include/dsn/utility/binary_writer.h


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Juan Pan(Trista), Apache ShardingSphere PMC, Apache brpc (Incubating) IPMC
Twitter, @trista86934690


On 06/12/2021 19:38,Yingchun Lai<acelyc1112...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi, all

This is a call for a vote to release Apache Pegasus (Incubating) version
2.2.0-RC0.

Pegasus is a distributed key-value storage system that is designed
to be simple, horizontally scalable, strongly consistent, and
high-performance.

The Apache Pegasus community has voted on and approved a proposal to
release Apache Pegasus 2.2.0-RC0.
Apache Pegasus community vote thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r5f045c9f82e67c01bc23504b66960fb07afdd72875b8e1c808a05e31%40%3Cdev.pegasus.apache.org%3EVote
Result thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r89ca7e3caf0790c9244480db6a105611b00732dd81b9da934b1fbc82%40%3Cdev.pegasus.apache.org%3E

The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/pegasus/2.2.0-RC0/

It is tagged in Git as v2.2.0-RC0 and the corresponding hash is the
following:
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-pegasus.git;a=commit;h=a81b6c78cca29d679ae51d7cf5287334c914e3dd

KEYS file available:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/pegasus/KEYS

For information about the contents of this release, see:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/167M4R063FYcMXOahaInxkjJ8MBYBpzQ1ijeh0qC9SrE/edit?usp=sharing

The vote will be open for 72 hours.
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason

Best regards,
Yingchun Lai

Reply via email to