On 07/12/15 11:59, Ben Gamari wrote: >> If the name "showCallStack" suggests the compiler-derived output, we >> could change it to something like "prettyCallStack" or >> "formatCallStack", I don't have a strong opinion there. > > I have also struggled with these sorts of naming decisions. The > overloading of the word "show" is a bit problematic. (+1) for "pretty".
As a total proponent of Show-is-derived, +1 for a better name. _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
