Thanks, but that patch looks like for CPR. In our case demands are changed, so I don't see how that's related. Am I missing anything in that patch?
2016-02-27 3:49 GMT-05:00 Joachim Breitner <m...@joachim-breitner.de>: > Hi, > Am Freitag, den 26.02.2016, 22:12 -0500 schrieb Ömer Sinan Ağacan: >> While working on demand analyzer today we realized that there has >> been some changes in demand analysis results between GHC 7.10.2 and >> 8.0-rc2. > > > a quick git log highlights this commit, as it relates to strict data > constructors: 0696fc6d4de28cb589f6c751b8491911a5baf774 > > commit 0696fc6d4de28cb589f6c751b8491911a5baf774 > Author: Simon Peyton Jones <simo...@microsoft.com> > Date: Fri Jun 26 11:40:01 2015 +0100 > > Improve CPR behavior for strict constructors > > When working on Trac #10482 I noticed that we could give constructor > arguments the CPR property if they are use strictly. > > This is documented carefully in > Note [CPR in a product case alternative] > and also > Note [Initial CPR for strict binders] > > There are a bunch of intersting examples in > Note [CPR examples] > which I have added to the test suite as T10482a. > > I also added a test for #10482 itself. > > I did not investigate whether this could actually have effected¹ this > change. > > Greetings, > Joachim > > ¹ How do you recognize a regular xkcd reader? > He uses effect as an verb. https://xkcd.com/326/ > > -- > -- > Joachim “nomeata” Breitner > m...@joachim-breitner.de • https://www.joachim-breitner.de/ > XMPP: nome...@joachim-breitner.de • OpenPGP-Key: 0xF0FBF51F > Debian Developer: nome...@debian.org > > > _______________________________________________ > ghc-devs mailing list > ghc-devs@haskell.org > http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs > _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
