Hi,

Am Donnerstag, den 16.02.2017, 17:46 +0000 schrieb g...@git.haskell.org:
> commit f4aa9984790332a908e8b1321d00a839fb42c3ea
> Author: Simon Peyton Jones <simo...@microsoft.com>
> Date:   Thu Feb 16 17:44:58 2017 +0000
> 
>     Better perf for haddock.base, haddock.Cabal
>     
>     I think this is due to
>       commit 6bab649bde653f13c15eba30d5007bef4a9a9d3a
>       Author: Simon Peyton Jones <simo...@microsoft.com>
>       Date:   Thu Feb 16 09:42:32 2017 +0000
>     
>           Improve checking of joins in Core Lint
>     
>     Improvement is around 5%.

no,
https://perf.haskell.org/ghc/#revision/fc9d152b058f21ab03986ea722d0c94688b9969f
clearly points to this commit:

    commit fc9d152b058f21ab03986ea722d0c94688b9969f
    Author: Simon Peyton Jones <    simo...@microsoft.com    >
    Date:   Thu Feb 16 09:41:55 2017 +0000

        Comments and tiny refactor only

    Which is not just a refactoring. If you look at the diff, e.g. at
    https://phabricator.haskell.org/rGHCfc9d152b058f21ab03986ea722d0c94688b9969f
you will see that after your change, the “one shot arguments according
to the environment” are no longer counted towards n_val_args in
fun_uds and is_exp. And it seems they should not! Is that something you
understand and can explain in a note?

I guess https://phabricator.haskell.org/D3089 was merged a bit
prematurely in that respect.¹

Greetings,
Joachim


¹ There is a workflow problem with Phab’s DR:
  * A creates a new DR.
  * B requests changes. DR now in state “revision needed”
  * C requests changes. DR still in state “revision needed”
  * A makes changes. DR now in state “needs review”
  * C looks at the changes and finds his concern addressed
    and accepts the revision. DR now in state “accepted”.
  * G comes along, sees a DR in state “accepted” and lands it.
  Problem: B did not have the chance to check the new revision.


  



-- 
Joachim “nomeata” Breitner
  m...@joachim-breitner.de • https://www.joachim-breitner.de/
  XMPP: nome...@joachim-breitner.de • OpenPGP-Key: 0xF0FBF51F
  Debian Developer: nome...@debian.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs

Reply via email to