On 08/04/2018 15.01, Michal Terepeta wrote:
> I'd be happy to help. :) I know a bit about the backend (e.g., cmm level), 
> but it might be tricky to find there some smaller/self-contained projects 
> that would fit ZuriHac.

Hey Michal,

that's great. Is there a topic you would like to give a talk about, or a pet 
peeve task that you'd like to tick off with the help of new potential 
contributors in a hacking session?

Other topics that might be nice and that you might know about are "How do I add 
a new primop to GHC", handling all the way from the call on the Haskell side to 
emitting the code, or (if I remember that correctly) checking out that issue 
that GHC doesn't do certain optimisations yet (such as emitting 
less-than-full-word instructions e.g. for adding two Word8s, or lack of some 
strength reductions as in [1]).

> You've mentioned performance regression tests - maybe we could also work on 
> improving nofib?

For sure!
Shall we run a hacking session together where we let attendees work on both 
performance regression tests and nofib? It seems these two fit well together.

Niklas

[1]: 
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/23315001/maximizing-haskell-loop-performance-with-ghc/23322255#23322255


_______________________________________________
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs

Reply via email to