> Your feedback is appreciated in a new proposal to streamline > communication with the authors of the GHC API as GHC evolves [1].
Errata: - communication with the authors of the GHC API + communication with the *users* of the GHC API Cheers! On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 5:19 PM Facundo Domínguez <facundo.doming...@tweag.io> wrote: > > Dear GHC devs, > > Your feedback is appreciated in a new proposal to streamline > communication with the authors of the GHC API as GHC evolves [1]. > > The proposal aims to set a process to collect detailed information on > how users depend on the GHC API, and how GHC developers think these > dependencies should be adjusted when there are breaking changes. > > This proposal is related to the endeavor to stabilize the GHC API [2]. > Although, rather than trying to define a stable API, it sets a process > to deal with the current state of affairs where users depend on many > unstable parts. > > Looking forward to your thoughts! > Facundo > > [1] https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/issues/24096 > [2] > https://discourse.haskell.org/t/charting-a-course-toward-a-stable-api-for-ghc/7646 > > -- > All views and opinions expressed in this email message are the > personal opinions of the author and do not represent those of the > organization or its customers. -- All views and opinions expressed in this email message are the personal opinions of the author and do not represent those of the organization or its customers. _______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
