I agree caution is warranted, but I still want the type level to behave as closely as possible to the term level, where literals are currently overloaded.
I don't care if it's monomorphic literals everywhere or overloaded literals everywhere, but I oppose a discrepancy. Vlad On Mon, Oct 30, 2023, 10:05 Simon Peyton Jones <simon.peytonjo...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm pretty cautious about attempting to replicate type classes (or a > weaker version thereof) at the kind level. An alternative would be to us > *non-overloaded* literals. > > Simon >
_______________________________________________ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
