Wrongly, as it turned out. Sorry! The problem remains.
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 2:37 PM, David Feuer <david.fe...@gmail.com> wrote: > And I've closed it as worksforme. I couldn't reproduce the problem > with 7.11.20150103. > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:42 AM, adam vogt <vogt.a...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I've added it as https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/10009 >> >> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Richard Eisenberg <e...@cis.upenn.edu> >> wrote: >>> After quite a bit of thought, I agree that this is a regression and that >>> the original program should be accepted. >>> >>> Make a bug report! >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Richard >> _______________________________________________ >> Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list >> Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org >> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
