On 05/13/2014 08:00 AM, Nagaprasad Sathyanarayana wrote:
On 05/07/2014 03:44 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:

----- Original Message -----
From: "Raghavendra Gowdappa" <rgowd...@redhat.com>
To: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkara...@redhat.com>
Cc: "Vijay Bellur" <vbel...@redhat.com>, gluster-devel@gluster.org,
"Anand Avati" <aav...@redhat.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 7, 2014 3:42:16 PM
Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] regarding special treatment of ENOTSUP
for setxattr

I think with "repetitive log message suppression" patch being merged, we
don't really need gf_log_occasionally (except if they are logged in
DEBUG or
TRACE levels).
That definitely helps. But still, setxattr calls are not supposed to
fail with ENOTSUP on FS where we support gluster. If there are special
keys which fail with ENOTSUPP, we can conditionally log setxattr
failures only when the key is something new?

I know this is about EOPNOTSUPP (a.k.a. ENOTSUPP) returned by setxattr(2) for legitimate attrs.

But I can't help but wondering if this isn't related to other bugs we've had with, e.g., lgetxattr(2) called on invalid xattrs?

E.g. see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=765202. We have a hack where xlators communicate with each other by getting (and setting?) invalid xattrs; the posix xlator has logic to filter out invalid xattrs, but due to bugs this hasn't always worked perfectly.

It would be interesting to know which xattrs are getting errors and on which fs types.

FWIW, in a quick perusal of a fairly recent (3.14.3) kernel, in xfs there are only six places where EOPNOTSUPP is returned, none of them related to xattrs. In ext[34] EOPNOTSUPP can be returned if the user_xattr option is not enabled (enabled by default in ext4.) And in the higher level vfs xattr code there are many places where EOPNOTSUPP _might_ be returned, primarily only if subordinate function calls aren't invoked which would clear the default or return a different error.

--

Kaleb





_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Reply via email to