Also, IANAL, but their code is GPL compatible, even if they are being dicks and requiring copyright assignment for their proprietary dual licensing. But at least their code is GPL compatible, which OpenSSL's is not. So I say +1, use this.
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Joe Julian <j...@julianfamily.org> wrote: > It has a specific exclusion for GPL 3.0. > https://polarssl.org/foss-license-exception > > On May 27, 2014 8:01:51 AM PDT, Kaleb KEITHLEY <kkeit...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> On 05/27/2014 11:00 AM, Kaleb KEITHLEY wrote: >>> >>> In any event, it's license didn't pollute our code. Do we need >>> to have our attorney bless the change. >> >> >> _its_ license didn't pollute our code. >> >> -- >> >> Kaleb >> >> ________________________________ >> >> Gluster-devel mailing list >> Gluster-devel@gluster.org >> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > > > -- > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
