On 07/08/2014 01:54 PM, Avra Sengupta wrote:
In the test case, we are checking gluster snap status to see if all the
bricks are alive. One of the snap bricks fail to start up, and hence we
see the failure. The brick fails to bind with "Address already in use"
error. But if we see clearly that same log also says "binding to
failed", where the address is missing. So it might be trying to bind to
the wrong(or empty) address.
Following are the brick logs for the same:
[2014-07-07 11:20:15.662573] I
[rpcsvc.c:2142:rpcsvc_set_outstanding_rpc_limit] 0-rpc-service:
Configured rpc.outstanding-rpc-limit with value 64
[2014-07-07 11:20:15.662634] W [options.c:898:xl_opt_validate]
0-ad94478591fc41648c9674b10143e3d2-server: option 'listen-port' is
deprecated, preferred is 'transport.socket.listen-port', continuing with
correction
[2014-07-07 11:20:15.662758] E [socket.c:710:__socket_server_bind]
0-tcp.ad94478591fc41648c9674b10143e3d2-server: binding to failed:
Address already in use
[2014-07-07 11:20:15.662776] E [socket.c:713:__socket_server_bind]
0-tcp.ad94478591fc41648c9674b10143e3d2-server: Port is already in use
[2014-07-07 11:20:15.662795] W [rpcsvc.c:1531:rpcsvc_transport_create]
0-rpc-service: listening on transport failed
[2014-07-07 11:20:15.662810] W [server.c:920:init]
0-ad94478591fc41648c9674b10143e3d2-server: creation of listener failed
[2014-07-07 11:20:15.662821] E [xlator.c:425:xlator_init]
0-ad94478591fc41648c9674b10143e3d2-server: Initialization of volume
'ad94478591fc41648c9674b10143e3d2-server' failed, review your volfile again
[2014-07-07 11:20:15.662836] E [graph.c:322:glusterfs_graph_init]
0-ad94478591fc41648c9674b10143e3d2-server: initializing translator failed
[2014-07-07 11:20:15.662847] E [graph.c:525:glusterfs_graph_activate]
0-graph: init failed
[2014-07-07 11:20:15.664283] W [glusterfsd.c:1182:cleanup_and_exit] (-->
0-: received signum (0), shutting down
Regards,
Avra
On 07/08/2014 11:28 AM, Joseph Fernandes wrote:
Hi Pranith,
I am looking into this issue. Will keep you posted on the process by EOD
Regards,
~Joe
----- Original Message -----
From: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkara...@redhat.com>
To: josfe...@redhat.com
Cc: "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel@gluster.org>, "Rajesh Joseph"
<rjos...@redhat.com>, "Sachin Pandit" <span...@redhat.com>,
aseng...@redhat.com
Sent: Monday, July 7, 2014 8:42:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] regarding spurious failure
tests/bugs/bug-1112559.t
On 07/07/2014 06:18 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
Joseph,
Any updates on this? It failed 5 regressions today.
http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB/541/consoleFull
http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/175/consoleFull
http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/173/consoleFull
http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/166/consoleFull
http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/172/consoleFull
One more :
http://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB/543/console
Pranith
CC some more folks who work on snapshot.
A lot of regression runs are failing because of this test unit. Given
feature freeze is around the corner, shall we provide a +1 verified
manually for those patchsets that fail this test?
-Vijay
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
