On 11/11/2014 05:25 PM, Kiran Patil wrote:
I have installed gluster v3.6.1 from
http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/LATEST/EPEL.repo/epel-6/
The /tests/bugs/bug-1112559.t testcase passed in all 3 runs and rest
of the two tests quota-anon-fd-nfs.t,
/tests/bugs/886998/strict-readdir.t failed in all 3 runs.
Thanks for this mail Kiran. http://review.gluster.org/8201 will fix
/tests/bugs/886998/strict-readdir.t
CCed vijaikumar to look into the quota-anon-fd-nfs.t
Pranith
Ondisk filesystem is ext4.
Thanks for quick feedback.
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri
<pkara...@redhat.com <mailto:pkara...@redhat.com>> wrote:
On 11/11/2014 03:13 PM, Kiran Patil wrote:
Test Summary Report
------------------------------
./tests/basic/quota-anon-fd-nfs.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 16 Failed: 1)
Failed test: 16
This is a spurious failure at least on master. Could you run it
2-3 times to see if it is a consistent failure on cent-os.
./tests/bugs/886998/strict-readdir.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 30
Failed: 2)
Failed tests: 10, 24
What is the underlying backend filesystem?
./tests/bugs/bug-1112559.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 11 Failed: 2)
Failed tests: 9, 11
CC Joseph fernandez
Files=277, Tests=7908, 8046 wallclock secs ( 4.54 usr 0.98 sys +
902.74 cusr 644.05 csys = 1552.31 CPU)
Result: FAIL
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-devel@gluster.org>
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
