On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 11:59 PM, Atin Mukherjee <atin.mukherje...@gmail.com
> wrote:

> -Atin
> Sent from one plus one
>
> On 16-Mar-2016 11:32 am, "Raghavendra Talur" <rta...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Lot many fixes to tests were found to be not back ported to 3.7 and
> other release branches.
> > This causes tests to fail only in those branches and leaves the
> maintainers puzzled.
> >
> > Also, this seems to be the case with back porting code fixes too.
> >
> > I copied all the changes to tests/ dir on master to tests/ dir on 3.7
> branch and posted a patch at http://review.gluster.org/#/c/13683/ .
> >
> > This is failing for ./tests/bugs/distribute/bug-860663.t test :
> > [10:39:11] Running tests in file ./tests/bugs/distribute/bug-860663.t
> > tar: Removing leading `/' from member names
> > ./tests/bugs/distribute/bug-860663.t ..
> > 1..15
> > ok 1, LINENUM:23
> > ok 2, LINENUM:24
> > ok 3, LINENUM:26
> > ok 4, LINENUM:27
> > ok 5, LINENUM:30
> > ok 6, LINENUM:32
> > ok 7, LINENUM:35
> > not ok 8 , LINENUM:40
> > FAILED COMMAND: ! gluster --mode=script --wignore volume rebalance
> patchy fix-layout start
> > ok 9, LINENUM:42
> > ok 10, LINENUM:43
> > ok 11, LINENUM:45
> > ok 12, LINENUM:47
> > ok 13, LINENUM:50
> > ok 14, LINENUM:51
> > ok 15, LINENUM:55
> > Failed 1/15 subtests
> >
> > Given that it is a simple rebalance command that is failing I am
> assuming that a critical patch has not been back ported to 3.7, correct me
> if I am wrong.
> >
> > I request every developer to take responsibility of back porting patches.
> >
> >
> > Corollary question: Our test-framework is now capable of disabling tests
> for certain OS, certain branch etc. I would like to propose that we stop
> having tests in main git repo. This will remove need to back port test only
> fixes.
> Where are you going to host these .t files then?


Proposal was a separate git repo for tests. It seems very unlikely to
maintain it separately though.
Basically what I am looking for is making tests/ dir independent of git
branch but still part of the git repo.


>
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Raghavendra Talur
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gluster-devel mailing list
> > Gluster-devel@gluster.org
> > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>
>
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Reply via email to