On 04/13/2016 11:58 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
On 04/13/2016 09:15 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
On 04/08/2016 10:25 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
Hey Pranith, Ashish -
We have broken support for group virt after the following commit in
release-3.7:
commit 46920e3bd38d9ae7c1910d0bd83eff309ab20c66
Author: Ashish Pandey <aspan...@redhat.com>
Date: Fri Mar 4 13:05:09 2016 +0530
cluster/ec: Provide an option to enable/disable eager lock
Thinking more - do we need two different options to control eager
lock behavior for afr and ec? cluster.eager-lock can be applicable
for ec too as ec and afr are normally used in a mutually exclusive
manner. Are we resorting to a different key for glusterd's op-version
compatibility?
Tiering breaks all our assumptions, at the moment we want afr to use
eager-lock where as disperse to not for tiering, so it is better this
way.
This is only till we fix the eager-locking behavior in disperse in some
cases where it is not learning that other clients are competing for
locks. We already have a solution in place. After which both can be
enabled for things to work smooth.
Pranith
Pranith
Thanks,
Vijay
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
