On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 5:15 PM, Jeff Darcy <jda...@redhat.com> wrote:

> Two proposals, both pretty developer-focused.
>
> (1) Gluster: The Ugly Parts
> Like any code base its size and age, Gluster has accumulated its share of
> dead, redundant, or simply inelegant code.  This code makes us more
> vulnerable to bugs, and slows our entire development process for any
> feature.  In this interactive discussion, we'll identify translators or
> other modules that can be removed or significantly streamlined, and develop
> a plan for doing so within the next year or so.  Bring your favorite gripes
> and pet peeves (about the code).
>
> (2) Gluster Debugging
> Every developer has their own "bag of tricks" for debugging Gluster code -
> things to look for in logs, options to turn on, obscure test-script
> features, gdb macros, and so on.  In this session we'll share many of these
> tricks, and hopefully collect more, along with a plan to document them so
> that newcomers can get up to speed more quickly.
>
>
> I could extend #2 to cover more user/support level problem diagnosis, but
> I think I'd need a co-presenter for that because it's not an area in which
> I feel like an expert myself.
>

I can help here. We can chat offline about what exactly you had in mind and
take it from there.


> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> gluster-us...@gluster.org
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>



-- 
Pranith
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Reply via email to