On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 5:38 PM, Aravinda <avish...@redhat.com> wrote:
> It is possible to overload gf_lg/gf_msg to send events to local eventsd. > But we have to do additional parsing if we need to select the logs to > convert as events. If we introduce new API, then it is not different from > existing wrt adding events code in multiple places. But if it helps in > sharing the host/port and other information(which we are discussing to > support client events), I can give it a try(Move gf_event inside logging > infra) > Sounds good to me. I will wait for others inputs here as well > > regards > Aravinda > > On Wednesday 24 August 2016 05:15 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > > Just resending in case you missed this mail. > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 2:31 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < > pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> hi Aravinda, >> I was wondering what is your opinion in sending selected logs as >> events instead of treating them specially. Is this something you guys >> considered? Do you think it is a bad idea to do it that way? We can even >> come up with a new api which logs and then sends it as event. >> >> -- >> Pranith >> > > > > -- > Pranith > > > -- Pranith
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel