On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 12:47 AM, Shyam <srang...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 08/31/2016 03:14 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > >> hi, >> I will be sending status of this work every week. This is first >> mail of this work. >> > > Thank you. > > Work to be done in the coming weeks: >> - I will be sending initial cut of the design for snapshotting >> the private storage by doing file snapshots in gluster. >> - I will be sending out initial cut of the subdirectory mounts >> feature with tenant based access this week. >> > > I did not understand the relation of the sub-directory mount feature to > the block storage feature, could you elaborate? >
Ah!, sorry this got mixed up with block storage. There is no relation between this and block storage. This is just something that we are working on as well :-). Not sure where to put this at this point, so sent it along with this status. Sorry for the confusion :-(. > > - Prasanna and I are working on limiting access of one private >> storage by only one container. One way we thought of is to do internal >> locking on the file so that other accesses will get errors. But we are >> still looking to find other solutions. >> > > Delegations(?) but stricter, that you cannot break them in the traditional > fashion? > That might work too! -- Pranith
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
