On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 9:37 AM, Ravishankar N <ravishan...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 06/23/2017 09:15 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > > hi, > Now that we are doing backports with same Change-Id, we can find the > patches and their backports both online and in the tree without any extra > information in the commit message. So shall we stop adding text similar to: > > > Reviewed-on: https://review.gluster.org/17414 > > > Sometimes I combine 2 commits from master (typically commit 2 which fixes > a bug in commit 1) in to a single patch while backporting. The change ID is > not the same in that case and I explicitly mention the 2 patch urls in the > squashed commit sent to the release branch. So in those cases, some way to > trace back to the patches in master is helpful. Otherwise I think it is > fair to omit it. > Ah! makes sense. Maybe for exceptions, let us use this but as a rule maybe it doesn't seem like a bad idea to omit. Let us also hear from others. > > Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenk...@build.gluster.org> > > Reviewed-by: Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkara...@redhat.com> > > Tested-by: Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkara...@redhat.com> > > NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenk...@build.gluster.org> > > Reviewed-by: Amar Tumballi <ama...@redhat.com> > > CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenk...@build.gluster.org> > (cherry picked from commit de92c363c95d16966dbcc9d8763fd4448dd84d13) > > in the patches? > > Do you see any other value from this information that I might be missing? > > -- > Pranith > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-devel mailing > listGluster-devel@gluster.orghttp://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > > > -- Pranith
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel