https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171650
Niels de Vos <nde...@redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|b...@gluster.org |kaus...@redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Niels de Vos <nde...@redhat.com> --- (In reply to Kaushal from comment #3) > r.g.o now has clickable links to bugzilla. Great, thanks! > I'll also add links to Coverity, if I can figure out a direct URI to the CID > page. This seems to work: https://scan6.coverity.com:8443/query/defects.htm?projectId=10714&cid=1288824 > About, Change-Id's though, they are supposed to be unique to each review. So > if a patch were to be backported, it would have a different Change-Id to the > original. Backports often should have the same Change-Id. This makes it easy to identify backports and their original change. A Change-Id needs to be unique per branch, different branches (master, release-3.7, ...) can have the same Change-Id. Example: http://review.gluster.org/#/q/I62168a0ab4f0c78e61987371ae75a0d2dd56ced8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=1IbN7wTer9&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ Gluster-infra mailing list Gluster-infra@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra