Le mercredi 17 février 2016 à 08:13 -0500, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY a écrit : > On 02/16/2016 04:47 PM, Michael Scherer wrote: > > Le lundi 15 février 2016 à 17:11 +0100, Michael Scherer a écrit : > >> Le lundi 15 février 2016 à 17:07 +0100, Michael Scherer a écrit : > >>> Le lundi 15 février 2016 à 08:03 -0500, Kaleb Keithley a écrit : > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> e.g. > >>>> > >>>> ... > >>>> X-RedHat-Spam-Score: 2.614 ** (BAYES_50,MISSING_HEADERS,RDNS_NONE) > >>>> 66.187.224.184 [66.187.224.184] 66.187.224.184 [66.187.224.184] > >>>> <rev...@dev.gluster.org> > >>>> ... > >>>> > >>>> (yes, two asterisks is not really very high, but it's what I have to set > >>>> in my zimbra filter to catch the majority of the real spam.) > >>>> > >>>> Is there something we can do, e.g. add whatever missing headers are > >>>> necessary or an PTR record for dev.gluster.org to gluster.org DNS > >>>> somewhere, to yield lower scores? > >>> > >>> Yup, we can do that. I will ask IT as I do not have access. > >> > >> In fact, that's more complicated. > >> > >> We have 1 IP address incoming (66.187.224.201), which is natted to the > >> internal IP of the server, and we have 1 ip for outgoing connexion, > >> which is shared (66.187.224.184). > > > > So rdns is done. > > > > For missing_headers, there is this page: > > https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/Rules/MISSING_HEADERS > > > > I am a bit puzzled about it. Could you look at a previous mail header to > > see if something changed ? > > > > I'm not sure what a previous mail header is, or would tell us.
My goal is more to see ff there was the same problem before the migration. > Here are > the headers from one of the mails that had a MISSING_HEADERS hit. As you > can see it does not have a To: line. I guess Du really did only sent to CC: Ok so maybe "gerrit bug". Let's hope that the rdns stuff do fix it enough to not score above 2.0. If not, I guess gerrit update would solve that, once we can do that. > Is there somewhere I can set my ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs and adjust my > score for MISSING_HEADERS? On RH side, nope. Something that would help is the scoring used, so we can see if MISSING_HEADERS is 0.1 or 1.9. > From - Wed Feb 17 08:06:34 2016 > X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 > X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 > X-Mozilla-Keys: > Return-Path: rev...@dev.gluster.org^M > Received: from zmta06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (LHLO^M > zmta06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com) (10.5.81.13) by^M > zmail12.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com with LMTP; Mon, 15 Feb 2016^M > 21:50:44 -0500 (EST)^M > Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com > (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24])^M > by zmta06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP > id D79CE169703;^M > Mon, 15 Feb 2016 21:50:43 -0500 (EST)^M > Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx07.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com > [10.5.110.31])^M > by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) > with ESMTP id u1G2ohQA012057^M > (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 > verify=NO);^M > Mon, 15 Feb 2016 21:50:43 -0500^M > Received: from dev.gluster.org (unknown [66.187.224.184])^M > by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF83BC0BBE51;^M > Tue, 16 Feb 2016 02:50:41 +0000 (UTC)^M > Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])^M > by dev.gluster.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2046505F2;^M > Mon, 15 Feb 2016 18:46:43 -0800 (PST)^M > Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 18:46:43 -0800^M > From: "Raghavendra G (Code Review)" <rev...@dev.gluster.org>^M > CC: Gluster Build System <jenk...@build.gluster.com>,^M > NetBSD Build System <jenk...@build.gluster.org>,^M > Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkara...@redhat.com>,^M > Raghavendra Talur <rta...@redhat.com>,^M > Vijaikumar Mallikarjuna <vmall...@redhat.com>,^M > soumya k <skod...@redhat.com>^M > Reply-To: rgowd...@redhat.com^M > X-Gerrit-MessageType: comment^M > List-Id: <gerrit-glusterfs.review.gluster.org>^M > List-Unsubscribe: <http://review.gluster.org/settings>^M > Subject: Change in glusterfs[master]: performance/write-behind: > guaranteed retry after a short write^M > X-Gerrit-Change-Id: I73a18b39b661a7424db1a7855a980469a51da8f9^M > X-Gerrit-ChangeURL: <http://review.gluster.org/13438>^M > X-Gerrit-Commit: db8849a6285334aab502e1be9bd5dc876eaf89c3^M > In-Reply-To: > <gerrit.1455278893107.i73a18b39b661a7424db1a7855a980469a51da...@review.gluster.org>^M > References: > <gerrit.1455278893107.i73a18b39b661a7424db1a7855a980469a51da...@review.gluster.org>^M > MIME-Version: 1.0^M > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8^M > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit^M > Content-Disposition: inline^M > User-Agent: Gerrit/2.9.4^M > Message-Id: <20160216024643.e204650...@dev.gluster.org>^M > X-RedHat-Spam-Score: 2.614 ** (BAYES_50,MISSING_HEADERS,RDNS_NONE) > 66.187.224.184 [66.187.224.184] 66.187.224.184 [66.187.224.184] > <rev...@dev.gluster.org>^M > X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.24^M > X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 10.5.110.31^M > > > > -- Michael Scherer Sysadmin, Community Infrastructure and Platform, OSAS
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Gluster-infra mailing list Gluster-infra@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra