I think switches are much faster at their job than the kernel and avoiding
their use may be a mistake.
With regard to gluster, latency affects performance so if it's performance
you're looking for, lowest latency switches would be wiser.
If it's just network design you're asking for, this might not be the most
appropriate forum.
On February 14, 2015 2:19:43 AM PST, Ml Ml <mliebher...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>Hello List,
>
>i would like to build a 3 Node Cluster. I was thinking of such a setup:
>
>http://oi58.tinypic.com/2rfgghi.jpg
>
>My question:
>
>Can i set it up my network that way, that it will still work of one
>node fails?
>
>Just thinking about i want bonding and then i might even need a brige
>to bring the "two sides of the nodes together"?
>
>Will i then get loop? Do i need SPF or something alike?
>
>Could i also use TCP Multipath? ( i have no experience with tcp
>multipath so far)
>
>What do you think?
>
>
>Thanks,
>Mario
>
>p.s. i want to avoid switches here.
>_______________________________________________
>Gluster-users mailing list
>Gluster-users@gluster.org
>http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
