Hi Raghavendra,
> On 20 Mar 2018, at 1:55 pm, Raghavendra Gowdappa <rgowd...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Aggregating large number of small writes by write-behind into large writes > has been merged on master: > https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/364 > <https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/364> > > Would like to know whether it helps for this usecase. Note that its not part > of any release yet. So you've to build and install from repo. Sounds interesting, not too keen to build packages at the moment but I've added myself as a watcher to that issue on Github and once it's in a 3.x release I'll try it and let you know. > Another suggestion is to run tests with turning off option > performance.write-behind-trickling-writes. > > # gluster volume set <volname> performance.write-behind-trickling-writes off > > A word of caution though is if your files are too small, these suggestions > may not have much impact. I'm looking for documentation on this option but all I could really find is in the source for write-behind.c: if is enabled (which it is), do not hold back writes if there are no outstanding requests. and a note on aggregate-size stating that "aggregation won't happen if performance.write-behind-trickling-writes is turned on" What are the potentially negative performance impacts of disabling this? -- Sam McLeod (protoporpoise on IRC) https://smcleod.net https://twitter.com/s_mcleod Words are my own opinions and do not necessarily represent those of my employer or partners.
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users