Hi, Writing to a volume should not affect glusterd. The stack you have shown in the valgrind looks like the memory used to initialise the structures glusterd uses and will free only when it is stopped.
Can you provide more details to what it is you are trying to test? Regards, Nithya On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 at 15:41, ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpali...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Team, > > Please respond on the issue which I raised. > > Regards, > Abhishek > > On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 2:46 PM ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpali...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Anyone please reply.... >> >> On Thu, May 16, 2019, 10:49 ABHISHEK PALIWAL <abhishpali...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Team, >>> >>> I upload some valgrind logs from my gluster 5.4 setup. This is writing >>> to the volume every 15 minutes. I stopped glusterd and then copy away the >>> logs. The test was running for some simulated days. They are zipped in >>> valgrind-54.zip. >>> >>> Lots of info in valgrind-2730.log. Lots of possibly lost bytes in >>> glusterfs and even some definitely lost bytes. >>> >>> ==2737== 1,572,880 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record >>> 391 of 391 >>> ==2737== at 0x4C29C25: calloc (in >>> /usr/lib64/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) >>> ==2737== by 0xA22485E: ??? (in >>> /usr/lib64/glusterfs/5.4/xlator/mgmt/glusterd.so) >>> ==2737== by 0xA217C94: ??? (in >>> /usr/lib64/glusterfs/5.4/xlator/mgmt/glusterd.so) >>> ==2737== by 0xA21D9F8: ??? (in >>> /usr/lib64/glusterfs/5.4/xlator/mgmt/glusterd.so) >>> ==2737== by 0xA21DED9: ??? (in >>> /usr/lib64/glusterfs/5.4/xlator/mgmt/glusterd.so) >>> ==2737== by 0xA21E685: ??? (in >>> /usr/lib64/glusterfs/5.4/xlator/mgmt/glusterd.so) >>> ==2737== by 0xA1B9D8C: init (in >>> /usr/lib64/glusterfs/5.4/xlator/mgmt/glusterd.so) >>> ==2737== by 0x4E511CE: xlator_init (in /usr/lib64/libglusterfs.so.0.0.1) >>> ==2737== by 0x4E8A2B8: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libglusterfs.so.0.0.1) >>> ==2737== by 0x4E8AAB3: glusterfs_graph_activate (in >>> /usr/lib64/libglusterfs.so.0.0.1) >>> ==2737== by 0x409C35: glusterfs_process_volfp (in /usr/sbin/glusterfsd) >>> ==2737== by 0x409D99: glusterfs_volumes_init (in /usr/sbin/glusterfsd) >>> ==2737== >>> ==2737== LEAK SUMMARY: >>> ==2737== definitely lost: 1,053 bytes in 10 blocks >>> ==2737== indirectly lost: 317 bytes in 3 blocks >>> ==2737== possibly lost: 2,374,971 bytes in 524 blocks >>> ==2737== still reachable: 53,277 bytes in 201 blocks >>> ==2737== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks >>> >>> -- >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Regards >>> Abhishek Paliwal >>> >> > > -- > > > > > Regards > Abhishek Paliwal > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users@gluster.org > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
