Torbjorn Granlund <t...@gmplib.org> writes: > I notice you make this non-public. Is it premature to make it part of > the public interface?
I just put the declarations together with the other mpn_sec_* functions. I think it makes sense to make mpn_sec_div_*, mpn_sec_minvert and mpn_sec_powm public together. Does mpn_sec_powm need more work (besides the rename) before made public? Also about naming, I noticed the inconsistency between mpz_invert and mpn_invert, which do very different things. If/when we add an mpz function corresponding to mpn_sec_minvert, I guess that would be named mpz_sec_invert? Regards, /Niels -- Niels Möller. PGP-encrypted email is preferred. Keyid C0B98E26. Internet email is subject to wholesale government surveillance. _______________________________________________ gmp-devel mailing list gmp-devel@gmplib.org https://gmplib.org/mailman/listinfo/gmp-devel
